A blog of erotica, with a focus on Mormon themes, striving to reconcile the mind, body, and spirit schism in a glorious orgasm of oneness.
Thursday, January 4, 2007
Ravings of a Mad Woman: Sex, Porn and Postum -- A Review
I’ve spent the last five nights going to bed with Julie Henneman, I mean Julie Henneman’s book, Always Listen to the Ravings of a Mad Woman: A Story of Sex, Porn, and Postum in the Land of Zion. When I wasn’t curling up with the book, I was stalking her on her acronym filled blog. I would encourage all of you to go read her blog (and my unsolicited comments which she has graciously posted up until now.). As you can see from one her MySpace picture’s I pilfered, this appears to be one raving woman you might just want to listen to.
Now, I’m not usually a chick lit[1] kind of guy and this book is definitely chick-litty, so I am going to have to rely on my somewhat ashamed addiction to Sex and the City for insight into the burgeoning world of chick lit. In chick-lit, the heroine has at least two, probably three side kicks – the oversexed beauty, the New Agey friend and the newcomer. Ravings’ heroine, Corinne, has all three and two spinster visiting teachers as well.
Yes, visiting teachers, Sister Sunny and Sister Bright. This book takes place in Salt Lake City (as evidenced by the Salt Lake temple out the naked woman's window on the cover) and in the heart of Mormon-dom. The first couple of chapters were filled with what would be Mormon[2] cliches if we had more Mormon-centric fiction: phallic temples, South American missionary with 2 baptisms a week and a parasite, bad Utah drivers, Honor Roll bumper stickers, Mormon Assault Vehicle (mini-van) and of course, Postum[3].
But what about the sex? SEX HERE FOR ALL YOU PORNO FREAKS. Yes, the book has sex -- some steamy explicit scenes[4] with thong underwear, lactation and doggy style sex, but here is the rub – the book is ostensibly anti-porn[5]. I’m intrigued by the dichotomy of the anti-porn heroine fucking her dentist, well, almost fucking her dentist. The equivalent is a book on the evils of alcoholism with a hero, who doesn’t mind a shot or two of tequila to quiet the nerves or on the evils of drug addiction, with a hero who breaks out the meth pipe when he gets tired.
The battle of the pro-sex and anti-sex feminists is played out inside the heroine’s head. You can almost hear Catherine MacKinnon or Andrea Dworkin whispering "All sex is rape", while Corinne’s body fills with raw lust. No wonder she is raving. Throw into that secular mix, all of the Mormon religion’s spin on sex and it is no wonder Corinne is a confused mess. Corinne’s pop psychology answer is that her husband is a sex addict, because he can’t stop looking at porn and jacking off. She is a co-addict facilitating his descent into addiction. Porn is the ostensible smack of his sex addiction.
Having been accused of being a sex addict at various times in my life[6], I read with interest Ms. Henneman’s dissection of the male characters in this book. Men, we don’t come out very well. After picking up a younger man at a club and bringing him home, Corinne rebuffs him at the last minute, because she doesn’t want to be just a piece of ass and respects herself more than that. She later does the same when dumping her dentist. She accuses her husband of wanting to use her as a live masturbatory device. (You can take the girl out of Mormonism, but you can’t take the Mormonism out of the girl.)
For the main character, the mere presence of male sexual attraction and desire reduces and objectifies women. This is an insidious double standard with male desire as objectifying, demeaning and crass and female desire as subjective, uplifting and pure. This double standard is just as perverse and dysfunctional as the double standard of male sexuality being studly and female sexuality being slutty. Sex is yin and yang and when it is working best, more complementary than competitive.
The book resonated with me on what I am sure is a normal and frequent reaction women have to finding their significant male other viewing porn. The disturbing part however is what will make it sell well in the female coffee clatches --- the lack of empathy for the male point of view. Corinne seems incapable of understanding why her husband is hiding the porn from her, even though they had viewed it together before.
News Flash: Her husband was raised Mormon. Mormon's hide their sexuality, especially Mormon men. We hide our communal historical sexuality. Hell, men are programmed to hide our masturbation, even lie about it to function well within the society from the age of 12 on. Damn, Boyd K. Packer and that little pamphlet. You either lie to the bishop or you are on a continual track of repentance for your sexuality from puberty to marriage. With a conditioning program like that, of course you are going to hide your porn. Half the thrill is in the deceit, because that got indoctrinated with every teenage orgasm spasm.
I think the ending of the book is quite telling, because the porn-addicted husband leaves his apostate wife and goes back to church. This novel could be used as a religious tract by the Mormon side – his wayward wife wouldn’t forgive him for his porn addiction and he repented, stopped drinking beer and started going to church and when she wouldn’t follow, so they got divorced. Having him return to church activity and Elder’s quorum president status in his single ward is the happy Mormon ending. The main twist is this book is told solely from the smart ass wife’s point of view.
Now before you think I’m being sexist, calling the main character and narrator a smart ass – she is. In fact, her smart ass attitude is one of the most enjoyable parts of the book. The whole book feels like you are just waiting for her to start flipping you off as the reader. Corinne may have a complete lack of compassion for the male perspective, but this is chick lit and you have to have a sassy attitude – it is a requirement of the genre. Think Sarah Jessica Parker in Sex in the City as a Mormon housewife, along with a little Roseanne Barr thrown in and you get the picture.
Which brings me to the conclusion of my review – Will I always listen to the ravings of this mad woman? No. Will I always find the ravings amusing? Usually. Should you buy the book? Damn skippy, you can never buy too many books. The book excels at giving a realistic picture of how warped views of sexuality muck up people’s lives, even though it falls short of giving a full and balanced picture. I also think of this as a genre piece of fiction and as a piece of Utah based chick lit, it is the closest things we have to Bridget Jone’s Diary with visiting teachers.[7]
FOOTNOTES
[1] Chick lit is short for chick literature which is short for feminist sponsored literary endeavors, usually published with pastel colors on the cover. It appears that Ravings opted for the more resplendent red satin color of a romance novel, but this isn’t a romance novel, so don’t be fooled by the cover.
[2] When I use the term Mormon, I am using it in the sense of relating to all things Mormon, say within six degrees of separation of Joseph Smith. Thus, Ex-Mo, Pro-Mo, Anti-Mo, Post-Mo and even Slo-Mo would all be included.
[3] I’ve always had a fondness for that grainy drink. Given the fact that I like only a little coffee with massive amounts of milk and sugar, Postum really does taste the same as coffee to me. My grandparents always used to have Postum and it was damn good. Not Ovaltine, but the fact that it was sinisterly close to coffee (and being made out of barley – close to beer, too) warmed my heart as much as the boiled water. One interesting side effect of reading the book – I went out and got myself some Postum.
[4] Page 58 and 70-72 if you can’t wait when you get the book. Plus you can go to Julieann’s short story on the web that has "pussy" in the first sentence.
[5] Yes, I intended the capital letters to be ironic -- and attract attention.
[6] The first time would have to have been my self accusations as I headed with dread into the bishop’s office to confess yet again that I had again violated the law of chastity by beating off. I always tried to stop at least a month before the scheduled interview so that I could plead repentance.
[7] The visiting teachers at the strip club scene is worth the price of the book alone. JulieAnn, the last half sentence was the blurb you can use showing how wonderful I thought it all was.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
MORMON EROTICA
The blog is devoted to exploring sexual issues arising out of American and Mormon culture. While the prurient may occasionally surface and while the tone may be sarcastic or sacreligious, the discussion is serious. I want to get deep.
14 comments:
Great book review here, TW. Interesting. I've never read this book before. Interesting that she had no problem sleeping around, but she'd divorce him for porn addiction.
Interesting.
This is a fun and entertaining review!!! So you're moving in on my book-reviewing thing, huh? ;-)
(J/K, there's plenty of room for more discussion of Mo-lit here in blogspace.)
I think I would have a really hard time liking this book if it's full of stuff like this:
"After picking up a younger man at a club and bringing him home, Corinne rebuffs him at the last minute, because she doesn’t want to be just a piece of ass and respects herself more than that."
There are few things in this world that piss me off quite as passionately as feminists claiming that women who like NSA sex must necessarily lack self-respect. There seems to be a current in modern feminist thought that says that if you're a woman and have any exhibitionist leanings (especially if get off on turning men on), then you must hate yourself and/or must have been abused as a child or something. It is incredibly insulting and limiting to even female sexuality to condemn certain ordinary turn-ons and fantasies in this way.
(Of course, there's a chance that that component and the anti-porn stuff would piss me off to the point of getting all worked up into a lather, which isn't too far from the desired response to erotica... ;-) )
SML,
Thanks for your kind words. I hope the author gets over here and enlightens us -- I think it would make for lively discourse, because yes it is very interesting.
c.l.,
When you wrote "NSA sex" I immediately began to wonder if the National Security Administration and the Bush administration hadn't instituted some new type of Lysistra-tian anti-terrorist campaign, but I figured that wasn't what you meant. Having grown up in Utah I didn't know there was such a thing as "No Strings Attached" Sex, but fortunately Google informed me properly.
I think that some of the frustrations you are talking about with the mentality come with the religious territory.
And yes, I'm going to become Siskel to your Ebert in the Mo-lit book review blogs. I've got this review coming up next week on a book by this great author, uhhh, c.l. hanson I think her name is. You should really stay tuned for that one.
Can you review a book by someone who was your first? I hope so, because I'm going to.
Thanks for being my first again c.l. -- there is nothing like the first time --- someone posts on your blog.
Kewl!!! :D
A lot of people have discussed the novel's treatment of LDS adolescence in general, but I don't think it's been reviewed as erotica yet...
Well, well, well. I didn't realize I could be so delighted by a review that is both damning and gracious, all at once. Thank you, OGTR. I haven't stopped smiling yet. I would love to join in a dialogue with you and the lovely cl hanson et. al. Perhaps I can shed some light on the whole premise of this porn vs. sex. vs. addiction vs. Mormonism vs. men thing. BTW, shame on your for the pilfer. Tsk tsk.
First. The book is NOT anti-porn. I am not anti-porn. I like porn (Suicide Girls is my fav). I WRITE erotica. Everyone on board? Cool!
The book is anti-ADDICTION. We will get to what an addiction is versus what an obvious sexual obsession is in a moment.
You cited the dichotomy of a hero that is against alcoholism, taking a drink. My question to you is......so? A person can have a glass of wine and still feel strongly that alcoholism is a detriment to our society. There is a difference between drinking and alcoholism. There is a difference between liking sex and porn and being a sex and porn addict.
Here is the difference--here is how you can differentiate between healthy sexuality and unhealthy. With unhealthy sexuality, sex is an act used to cover up or escape unwanted, uncomfortable or painful feelings. And it is done continually, so that the feelings are never addressed and never resolved. As for the partner of the addict(the POV and protagonist IS the focal point of the story, not the addict, keep in mind) their experience is this: an addict is incapable of connecting emotionally and spiritually with his or her partner. The partner invariably feels the disconnect and reacts in a myriad of ways, usually with feelings of rejection, feeling used, objectified and hurt. And it isn't easy to spot. It usually hits when the deed is done and you are left alone in the dark with only your pain with which to cuddle.
The person who has unhealthy sexuality has obsessive thoughts that can only be assuaged by compulsively acting out DESPITE RECURRENT AND NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES. Did you hear that or do I need to yell it again? LOL
I capitalized because this is important. The person that is caught looking at porn at work and is written up, but still does it because they have no control over their compulsion...THIS is the sign of an addict.
An addict will keep it a secret because of shame, not because they are Mormon, Catholic or Neo-druidic pagan. They will keep it a secret because their LACK of SELF CONTROL causes them to feel intense shame and guilt. Mormons didn't corner the market on shame surrounding sexuality, T., you should know that.
'Pop psychology?' Not so much. It's called 'addiction', and the drug of choice is irrelevant. It is the feelings and chemicals released in the brain that is the real drug. Porn, shopping, food, sex....they are all just the facilitators.
Does this sound fun? Does this kind of sexuality sound enticing to you? It shouldn't because it isn't. It is an agonizing condition and the addict is in a constant flux of shame, pain, guilt and for brief moments, a small sense of relief before the cycle begins again. Not very romantic is it?
Now Corinne...she does not sleep with anyone. But she is just as much an addict as her husband, and she comes to realize this. Her knee-jerk reaction to being literally ALONE in a relationship for 17 years is to look outside the relationship for some semblance of intimacy. She doesn't sleep with the young guy or the dentist anymore not because intrinsically and monumentally it is WRONG (It irks me when people take one character's point of view and blankets it over the whole of society! C'mon people, it's ONE POV!) She doesn't sleep with them because she becomes aware that in doing so, she is compulsively acting out her own version of addiction and she knows it does not serve her. HER. Not all women. Her. And of course she views all men's attraction in an unhealthy, suspicious way. LOOK at her life, her background. Of COURSE there is a double standard. She has lived it her whole life. Her father was a sex addict, her husband a sex addict...really, has there ever been a healthy, normal model for her? Slanted, unfair? You bet. But that's where she is coming from, and that's where she's at.
Keep in mind, too that the husband is not a bad guy, and it is apparent. He is caring, he is a good father--he is not some evil roach. So why can't you, OGTR, see and acknowledge that Brent, for all his foibles, is a good, decent man? I view him as decent. He just has that lying, addiction thing.....:0) The thing is, when you are an active addict, it is impossible for you to have close, loving relationships. Why? Because your addition is #1. Not your kids, not yourself, not your spouse...YOUR FIX. Do you want to be married to someone like that?
NOW, for the "happy Mormon ending." Hm...you really missed the point of that whole thing so I am going to talk about it at the risk of taking the fun out of it for the other readers (who sound like they may not pick up the book anyway LOL) Corinne moves on. Period. The whole point is, we don't know because it does NOT matter. We, as the reader, have to let go of him because Corinne had to let go, or she would have gone mad. SHE left him. By the end, the reader should know that with his patriarchal superiority complex and his lack of accountability, he would never go into recovery. He will always be an addict. Don't assume that just because Brent is in a Church job, he is all of a sudden living in integrity with his professed beliefs. You, of anyone should know that assuming one is pious based on their church activity is a load of horse shit. :0)
Okay, I hope I cleared some stuff up and then some.
Oh, PS: Don't assume that because the main character doesn't have NSA sex is because she has self respect and other women don't. Read the book. This is so out of context, it isn't funny.
I don't have as much time as I would like to respond, so I'm going to postpone my extensive reply -- briefly. I just have to say, I'm so happy that I got some raving of my very own.
Delicious.
I want to buy this book :)
Right now.
Do you think it's possible, then, to be addicted to NOT having sex?
Hmmm.....
Steve,
Yes, it is possible to be addicted to not having sex. It's called asexuality, ISD or frigidity. Although there are many, many causes for such conditions (many people who have this condition do not have it by choice), the person who is addicted to it is most likely addicted not to the avoidance of sex, but rather the perceived power and control this avoidance gives him or her.
Peace,
JulieAnn
Oh God. Julieann commented "The thing is, when you are an active addict, it is impossible for you to have close, loving relationships. Why? Because your addition is #1. Not your kids, not yourself, not your spouse...YOUR FIX. Do you want to be married to someone like that?" and I had to wonder if that's how my blogging affects my marriage.
Now I'm depressed. And still I sit here blogging.
And what does it say when I can immediately reply to your comment SML?
Sister,
Have no fear. I think we are all addicted to SOMETHING to one degree or another.
That is supposed to make you feel better....hm. Now I'M depressed....shit.
LoL
TW, it says, "NOW I know why I like you!"
Julieann, don't be depressed. Let us all embrace our addictions and claim ownership. Yesssss.
Ok...I embrace my coffee...ooh, hot, hot, hot..ouch. Damn.
Post a Comment